Debate Or ‘The Bet’?
Tuesday, July 15th, 2008July 15th 2008 witnessed a record set for this country (Malaysia). For the first time ever, after 51 years of Independence the Public get to see a live debate between two representatives - the Government and the Opposition.
The live debate was aired at 2100 hrs or 0900 p.m. Malaysian time on TV9 and the repeat broadcast was at 2300 hrs or 1100 p.m. on TV3. I missed the LIVE telecast because my wife was watching her favorite show - Cinderella - on TV 3. And that’s how we get to know that there’s going to be a repeat of the debate.

It’s a good thing my wife watched her favorite show…
The whole debate was nothing but series of flashback of unrelated past events, personal slanders and typical Kopitiam talk.
Except for Anwar Ibrahim’s mesmerizing speech…
Again, the Government, represented by the Information Minister: Ahmad Shabery Chik had taken after the predecessor: Zainuddin Maidin when he was interviewed by Al-Jazeera some time ago in an effort to rebut Anwar’s statement in an interview by the same channel before that.
Totally and ‘utterly’ rubbish…
Looks like there’s a big chance that the Malaysian Cabinet had to make a change after the live debate in the Information Ministry
Really. I’m NOT kidding!
Zam and Shabery had a LOT in common especially in ‘delivering speech’.
During the Al-Jazeera interview, Zam made himself sounds like an amateur whereby he’s supposed to be at the advance level, if he understand what ‘advance’ means.
Zam can write. Shabery can write. Both had the reputation as editor for popular local daily but when it comes to represent their fact and figures orally, they flop miserably!
WHAT HAD GONE WRONG WITH THE DEBATE?
Actually, this debate reminds me of the match between Nadal and Federer during Wimbledon.
If you’re a tennis fan or a sport fan, maybe you’ve followed the match. But if you not, let me tell you that Federer DID NOT win the game.
Nadal did.
What interest me after the match was the statistic and one thing in particular - the unforced error.
If you noticed, the total unforced error made by Nadal was like 27 (if I recalled correctly). And Federer, well being the World Number One as he is now, he made TWICE that number!
52 to be exact…
Maybe that’s cost him the tournament. I don’t know. But I suspect it’s one of the main factor for his loses.
Shabery Chick did the same thing as Federer.
NO. He’s not the Number One debater for Malaysia (I’m not sure if anyone know for sure) but he made too much ‘unforced’ error.
Let me try and spell a few right off the bat…
Giving history classes. Now, I understand that Shabery need to make a point and he need to make it fast and impactful. If he’s smart (which clearly shown throughout the debate that he’s NOT), he should know the fact that he’s up against someone who’ve got STANDING OVATION after his speech at United Nations some time ago.
Standing ovation at the UN…
That was not KID stuff and Shabery seems to forget that part of the history.
Sir, the podium is nothing like the blank white paper. That’s why they have Public Speaking classes. That’s why they have Toastmasters. And if you need to make a point using history, then learn how to do it well.
My favorite ‘model’ for this is none other than Tun Mahathir.
Tun knew a lot about using history to make a statement. In fact, that’s the thing he encourage fellow Malaysian to study. Not just memorizing dates and who did what to who and how, but what’s the lessons, what’s the motive behind all that.
For example, if he wanted to use the historical background of Anwar as a rebellion right from his heydays in the Uni, he need to relate that as a fact that what ‘motivate’ Anwar back then will only put this nation right where Anwar wants it - on the street!
And back that up with some ‘real’ fact and figures, and bring everything back to the matter at hand which is ‘Today Form the Government, Tomorrow Reduce Oil Price’.
And what does Anwar’s history got to do with all this? Come on…
That brings us to the next point…
Lack of solid evidence. I try to listen hard. Every time Shabery make his speech, I silenced everything around me (my wife especially who keeps asking me questions after questions) and I almost broke my TV speaker (I think) But even with that, it’s hard for me to get a single ’solid’ point from Shabery!
All I heard coming out from his mouth was a barrage of background personal attack.
That Sir, belongs on the street. Not on National TV Broadcast.
*********************************
SIDEBAR:
Funny thing to note - the debate was not aired on RTM where it’s
the Government main communication channel
*********************************
Overall delivery. Again, I need to remind our ‘beloved’ Ministers to know ‘thy enemy’ before having funny ideas such as open debate aired on National TV.
Be prepared. It’s better to PREPARE than to repair!
And I do honestly think that our current Government is beyond repair.
WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THIS?
Honestly, when I wake up tomorrow, I still had to think about my job. I still had to drive my car. I still have to eat my breakfast.
No matter who wins the debate, who lose his position, or who lose face - I still have to survive.
Will they care if we’re about to take a pay-cut?
Will they care if we lose our job?
Will they knock our door and hand us a fat cheque to ease our burden?
In your dreams friend!
We have to deal with the pay-cut.
We have to crawl the earth for new job.
We have to work our a** before we could get even a ‘thin’ cheque.
Can you depend on the Government?
How could you when the Government is depending on YOU.
So what can you learn from this?
It’s not the damn debate nor Political figure nor policy that’ll change our current situation but it all depend on ONE person - You!
I mean We…
Only we can make the difference.
Heck, with the current numbers of Opposition members in the Parliament, the price of oil still increase.
And the best thing that the Opposition can do was to walk out in the middle of a debate or shout their heart out some time, some where on the street outside the Parliament, thinking somehow this will bring the best out of thing.
Well friend, looks like they’re on the right track BUT on the wrong TRAIN!
I told someone earlier today that we are FREE to choose our action.
We’re however NOT free to choose the consequences.
Walk away as far as you like. Shout as loud as you like. You’re just on the wrong train.
It doesn’t matter if you’re on the right track because you’ll always be misinterpreted.
That’s all I got to say.
This debate is nothing but ‘the bet’. It’s everybody’s guess who the winner is.
Maybe it’s the highest wager ![]()






